Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Health Care Harmed by Stimulus Bill and the Obama Agenda

A concerned patient passed the following link Bloomberg.com: News concerning the hidden health care initiatives inside the stimulus bill. This post will remain in place for at least 2 days do to its importance.

As noted by the author, there are some very scary aspects of the provisions in this health care initiative.

Some of the concerns she points out are:

Page numbers correlate with the PDF version of H.R. 1 EH

  • The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479).
  • One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446).
  • Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)
  • What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make
  • The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192).
  • The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).

Most of what is here is very similar to what Daschle has proposed in the past and has written about in his book. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Rationing of Health care is inevitable if this bill passes in its current form and euthanasia is right around the corner!

Americans cannot allow this bill to pass and everyone needs to contact their legislators and demand they put a hold on this harmful agenda.

Labels: , ,

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very good information. Here are links to your senators and representatives

http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

2/11/2009 10:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Americans may think they are ready for socialized medicine, but they are poorly informed and will be very disappointed.

Obama is not the answer. His policies are going to devastate our country.

2/11/2009 02:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is left to devastate? All my savings disappeared before he took office. What else is there for him to take?

2/11/2009 05:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your freedoms!

And he plans on taking those as well.

Socialism is coming and getting more real every day Obama is in office

2/11/2009 07:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

will we the prolific anonymous also become more "real" every day when he is in office?

2/12/2009 12:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am sorely depressed by this rampant stupidity, under the stewardship of a medical professional as well. You should be ashamed.

2/12/2009 12:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who's that nutjob posting about shame? Jeez.
Hail Satan.

2/12/2009 12:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Council would reduce the number of drugs like Azor, where a drug company tries to extend it patent by combinding two inexpensive drugs(amlodipine/olmesartan) into a patented more expensive product, it might begin to help the health care budget.

2/13/2009 09:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the courts will reverse any actual application of these rules. look at the doctor prosecuted in New Orleans . legally better to spend the end of your life in treatment hell rather than a peaceful quick passing. Pelosi, et al have a point. doctors focus on length of life over quality of life much of the time. Pass me that cigarette.

2/14/2009 08:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't we have this already? Its called insurance. I was in the hospital for gastroenteritis and my insurance didn't pay for the lipid profile my doctor ordered as it wasn't related to the diagnosis. That fell back on me to pay. Now, I don't know how its not related, nor did I have any idea my doctor had ordered it, but I sure as hell know I would have refused the test if i didn't know my insurance wouldn't pay for it. I had a neighbor who died in the hospital, spent 3 months there racking up over $100,000 costs because family refused to let go after she coded time after time after time. And the doctors just kept on bringing her back, and cutting away at her, time after time after time. Maybe doctors need to be reigned in from ordering expensive tests 'just because' that we end up paying for or no one does in the case of the uninsured and the hospital ends up eating the costs and the human quality of care continues to decline with paperwork valued over personal touch.

2/15/2009 06:32:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home