Thursday, September 04, 2008

Thoughts on Palin


I am continually amazed at the democrats and their unrelenting attacks on Sarah Palin. I ask myself why this is occurring and the answer continues to come back to fear and jealousy.

They are fearful that the Republicans have chosen such a strong candidate who most represents everyday Americans. They are fearful she will connect with everyday moms and wives and garner the votes of many democratic women who would have voted for Hilary.

She is well-educated, well-spoken, beautiful and unrelenting in her convictions and resolve. She is complimentary to those women who paved the way before her whether they were democrat or republican.

She values life, she values family, and she is unafraid of speaking out against corruption.

She has more leadership and decision-making experience than Obama and she is roughly the same young age. She has been the mayor of a city and the Governor of the largest state in the Union. Under her leadership, Alaska invested $5 billion in state savings, overhauled education funding, and implemented the Senior Benefits Program that provides support for low-income older Alaskans. She created Alaska’s Petroleum Systems Integrity Office to provide oversight and maintenance of oil and gas equipment, facilities and infrastructure, and the Climate Change Subcabinet to prepare a climate change strategy for Alaska. During her first legislative session, Governor Palin’s administration passed two major pieces of legislation – an overhaul of the state’s ethics laws and a competitive process to construct a gas pipeline. Obama’s leadership experience is limited to a community organizer and what he says he led there has been less than successful, as noted in the following article. . Read article.

In Obama’s book, he says being a community organizer taught him how to motivate the powerless and work the government to help them and he gave his chief example as the effort to remove asbestos from Altgeld Gardens, an all-black public housing project on Chicago's South Side. The problem with this is that those who were involved in the effort say Obama played a minor role in working the problem and never accomplished his goal.

A pre-existing group at Altgeld Gardens and a local newspaper, the Chicago Reporter, were working on the problem before Obama came on the scene, yet Obama does not mention them in his book, "Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance."

"Just because someone writes it, doesn't make it true," says Altgeld resident Hazel Johnson, who had been pushing for a cleanup of the cancer-producing substance years before Obama showed up

In a second article from the Boston Globe, another Obama housing project is a catastrophic failure and highlights how governmental intervention is not a successful approach and is not fiscally responsible. http://clintondems.com/2008/06/grim-proving-ground-for-obamas-housing-policy/

The hypocrisy of the Democrats advocating for women yet criticizing Sarah Palin and personally attacking her family really highlights their true color. They only want women to advance and be successful if they have the same fundamental beliefs; otherwise they want to crush any progress.
The media bias is also blantantly obvious. Obama's lack of experience is completely given a pass by mainstream media because he is a male while Sarah Palin is microscopically scrutinized even though she has more leadership experience simply because she is female.

I think the democrats and mainstream media are fearful that a republican woman, with very grounded fundamental values, is a heartbeat away from the presidency. It has nothing to do with experience. If that were the case, their candidate for the number one slot would have been disqualified before he started.

Sarah Palin resonates with voters, has more experience than Obama, is a mother of 5, grounded in her principles and is well-liked by her home state.

The democrats and mainstream media are jealous that the first female vice-president is going to be a republican!

Labels: ,

18 Comments:

Blogger The New Albanian said...

Not me. I'm just opposed to religious fascism, whether black, white, Dem, Rep, male or female.

The rest is wondow dressing.

9/04/2008 07:51:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

NEW ALBANIAN: Would you like her better if she smoked cigarettes?

9/04/2008 08:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

GO Palin! Wonderful speech last night.

9/04/2008 08:45:00 AM  
Blogger Jeff Gillenwater said...

So, in other words, she raised taxes on corporations and used the money to expand the role of government. Funny then, having done that, that she spent time in her speech last night asking how people are better off if the people who create jobs are taxed more.

The "executive decision making" claim, spread so fiercely by the McCain team, is interesting as well. According to that measure, she's more qualified to be president than John McCain.

9/04/2008 08:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bluegill, you are too smart to make comments like these.

Republicans believe in limited govenrment not "no government".

Everyone understands and accepts some taxes, but by over-taxing companies, you diminish new job production and growth and the tax increases are then passed on to the consumer.

As for your last comment, HB has stated before. "you can't teach experience"

Yes she is far more qualified than Obama, but lacks the experience of McCain in Washington.

And for NAC, we are opposed to your areligious facism. There are moral standards whether you choose to accept them or not.

9/04/2008 09:23:00 AM  
Blogger Jeff Gillenwater said...

I'm not arguing about what does and doesn't constitute Republican ideology. I'm speaking of what she said versus what she did.

After all, she's the one who said how important it is to be the "same person" regardless of location. That's all I'm asking her to do

If you can refute what I wrote on a factual basis, feel free. You'd have to show that either she didn't raise oil company taxes or that she didn't use the money for government programs that she feels help people.

Problematically for you, she raised taxes on oil companies and she used the money for government programs, including some new ones according to HB.

During her speech, she questioned how anyone is better off when taxes are raised, strongly suggesting that they're not. What she didn't say was that raising taxes is sometimes a good idea and sometimes not.

It's a simple question: If people aren't better off when some taxes are raised, why did she raise them? And having raised them, why did she try to make such a big point about people being hurt by higher taxes, including when those taxes are aimed at employers?

In her home state of Alaska, the oil companies are by far the largest employers. They dominate the economy, providing the state over 80% of its budget.

In the bigger electoral scheme, it matters since if she believes that raising taxes on oil companies is the right thing to do in order to fund other programs, her stance in that area is closer to Obama's proposals than McCain's.

It also speaks directly to the long disproven "straight talk" campaign sloganeering.

9/04/2008 10:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Although I understand your point, her proposal was designed to reverse policies implemented under a state corruption scandal involving influence from the oil industry. This was more like a financial punishment for corrupt behavior.

This was not a windfall profits tax and this is a key difference between what the she did and what Senator Obama is proposing.

She was implementing a State decision under her jurisdiction and not a national policy. Her decision will very likely lead to less exploration in her state which could come back to haunt her.

What she did was not an opportunistic grab for political purposes as Obama continues to do.

Her decision was a state decision to try and fix a corrupt system and set her state up for good and bad times.

Alaska doesn't have the diversity of revenue streams that most other states have and with limited possibilities, her leadership and decision was correct.

You cannot extrapolate that to the nation.

9/04/2008 10:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why are the Republicans in such a outrage that the media is making un-complimentary comments about Sarah Palin? Look at all the attacks that were made against Hillary Clinton?

Remember the famous line "How do we stop the b**ch?" and McCain said, "Good question."?

The press, the Republicans, and a lot of other people were brutal to Hillary. Even Palin called her a whiner because she complained that Obama was getting a free pass from the press. I wonder how she feels now? She has not had to endure half of what Hillary had to endure.

If you want to play in the big leagues you have to be able to take the abuse.

9/04/2008 11:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama did get a free pass and continues to do so.

Palin will take the attacks with grace and style unlike Hilary

9/04/2008 11:06:00 AM  
Blogger Jeff Gillenwater said...

If I were trying to get her elected, I'd be careful about suggesting that her Alaskan experiences don't translate to the nation. A majority of voters just might agree with you.

HB was careful to say that Alaska was the largest state in the union. In terms of land mass, that's true. In terms of population, Palin has governed fewer people than Jerry Abramson in a state that, as you pointed out, doesn't reflect the rest of the country well at all.

9/04/2008 11:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey bluegill, I thought HB was the only black and white absolutist on this blog, but you are sounding more black and white all the time. Maybe there is still hope for you to see the error in your liberal thinking. We know you're smart enough.

It is a matter of seeing the truth and accepting it

9/04/2008 11:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

yeah, but not sure there is hope for NAC.

Certainly smart enough, but blinded by his own beliefs.

9/04/2008 11:42:00 AM  
Blogger Jeff Gillenwater said...

Here's a bit of truth for you:

One of the supposedly Republican ideals that I've tended to agree with is local rather than centralized control.

Under a Republican dominated (both executive and legislative) federal government, we now have less of that than we've ever had in the history of this country.

Unlike McCain - who voted in party lockstep an overwhelming majority of the time - both the New Albanian and I have used NAC as a vehicle to encourage local self-reliance.

9/04/2008 12:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I am reading with a short break at lunch, there are some nteresting comments from a diverse group today.

As for Bluegill, you sound more like a Federalist. Although the Republican party has been disappointing in several ways, the odds of getting less government is still far better with them than it will be with Obama.

I'd certainly like to hear your views on the obvious double standard of the liberals and mainstream media in this current circus.

Biden was a single father but no problem with that because he is a male.

Edwards extramarital affair suppressed for more than a year and now just given a pass and feel he might be able to get back into the political game.

Jesse Jackson's lovechild never caused anyone to ask for his "reverend" title or status to be eliminated

Experience of Obama never questioned by mainstream media.

Liberals and mainstream media has been continually negative towards traditional family values until all of a sudden it is so important to them.

I could go on and on with other examples, but time is limited.

9/04/2008 12:27:00 PM  
Blogger Jeff Gillenwater said...

I'll defer my time to Murphy Brown.

9/04/2008 02:59:00 PM  
Blogger lawguy said...

To anony 11:06 - did you even see Palin's speech before posting? I mean honestly...? While I have questions about her qualifications, my point is simply that if you did actually watch the speech, her attacks and jabs were anything but the "graceful tone" you suggested she would take. She's a fantastic public speaker, but she's well versed in bare knuckle politics, trust me...

HB...did you really say that she has "more experience" than Obama? C'mon....are you serious? A mayor of a town smaller than New Albany and a year and a half as a governor? She might have more experience hunting moose & caribou - and I'm sure the gun toting NRA conservatives rate that high on the list of "qualifications"...but honestly, usingt the word "MORE" is a bit of a stretch.

Today's tidbit revealed that she attended 5 colleges in 6 years. Wow...what tremendous acacademic achievement. I'm sure all the Repubs will find some way to spin that as more impressive than Obama's degrees from Columbia and Harvard Law.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

The most amusuing thing is watching the ever conservative republican party now touting her knocked up teen daughter and dropout boyfriend. If Chelsea Clinton had gotten knocked up, I somehow doubt it would be seen the same way by the Repubs.

But, again, that is the essennce of hypocrisy.

9/04/2008 08:43:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lawguy,

I did say more experience. The facts are very clear. Running a city of any size has its challenges and problems. Obama has run absolutely nothing.

Governing a State also is a very complicated job with many decisions and responsibilities. Again Obama has governed nothing.

Mayors and Governors choose appointments to positions, hire and fire employees and have many, many people answering to them. Again, Obama has nothing.

Are you actually stating that anyone with any degree from an Ivy League school is automatically smarter or better educated than everyone from non-Ivy League schools?

Surely you do not believe that rhetoric.

Give me any examples of any serious leadership positions Obama has held where he made a decision of any significance.

His interview last night with O’Reilly showed Obama is incapable of admitting he was wrong about the surge. His ego is getting in the way of his judgment. This is a serious problem in a leader.

9/05/2008 09:42:00 AM  
Blogger lawguy said...

HB -

Maybe its just me, but how on earth do Hawaii Pacific College, North Idaho College and Matanuska-Susitna College compare to an Ivy League School education? Sure, I hope I'm as bright and talented as some of my legal compatriots from the Ivy League law schools, but then again, I'm also not a heartbeat from the presidency, so its really not that important where I went to school.

I'm not raising an automatic judgment based upon the quality (or lack thereof) of one's Alma Mater, but I do think the caliber of one's education is a good measuring stone and bears some weight in one's credibility - or lack thereof. I cant imagine that a man of your great education wouldnt agree as to the importance of an exceptional education as a basis for one's success.

And if you think being the mayor of a town of 9,000 is prime experience to run the country, you're crazy. Heck, if that was true, we should nominate our own Doug England, who is in this third term (I believe...?) and running a bigger town than she ever did. Think Doug is Presidential material? He's a good mayor, but really....there might be a few folks more qualified than Doug....or Ms. Palin.

Since you asked what experience he's had (since it doesnt get much play on Fox News...), I would suggest Obama's seven years as a state senator (Chairing the Health and Human Services Committee), as well as a US Senator (with assignments on the Senate Committees for Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works and Veterans' Affairs, and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees, including serving as the Chairman of the Senate's subcommittee on European Affairs.

Again, might it be a bit "MORE" government based experience than 18 or so months as governor of a state with LESS than 600k people - a state half the size of Indy by population?

Its amusing that for all her "foreign affairs" skills, it was just last year that she got a passport for the first time in her life.

Experience, indeed.

Anyhow, let's get out to the golf course sometime soon...

9/07/2008 11:20:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home