Friday, August 22, 2008

Costly Error

As we round out this week with multiple examples of poor choices and why government should remain limited, here is another example of politicians making poor decisions and costing taxpayers lots of money.

In the hope that clean, well-maintained toileting facilities would lead to cleaner behavior among the homeless, Seattle spent upwards of $5 million dollars on space age stainless steel facilities.

They had purchased and operated five high-tech public toilets downtown in an effort to eliminate public defecation believing this was a health and safety issue.

They falsely believed that people are only as bad as their circumstances make them.

These high tech facilities became dens of prostitution and drug use and in the first two years of operation, the city responded to 7,418 reports of human waste in the streets, more than three times the 2,400 reports in the two years prior

Now the city is looking to rid themselves of these facilities and have listed them on eBay with a minimum bid of $89,000. The stainless steel units, pictured with stains, dents, and graffiti has received only a few bidders of a couple thousand dollars.

This has been a disastrous plan highlighting the false ideology prevalent among many well-intentioned government officials.
Let's limit government to what it was originally intended for and keep them from trying to protect people from themselves!

Labels: ,

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regarding: "Let's limit government to what it was originally intended for and keep them from trying to protect people from themselves!" GREAT IDEA!!

Let's return to the era of black slavery, voting restricted to white, male property owners, no standing national army, no federal regulation of food or drug safety, no national highways, no large industrial businesses and a primarily agrarian economy. Let’s pretend that nothing has changed and that a government structure designed for a late 18th century rural, pre-industrial, slave owning society should continue exactly as it was envisioned then.

8/22/2008 06:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh grow up.

There are legitimate purposes for government and legislating what people do personally is not one of them.

There should always be laws to protect individuals from others, but not to protect individuals from their own stupidity.

8/22/2008 08:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are two kinds of laws: good and bad

8/22/2008 09:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am amazed at the people who see the world in black and white colors only. If everything was that easy, there would be one religion instead of hundreds, one political party with all the right answers and no endless battles over which laws are "good" and which are "bad." You might wish the world to be a simple place but it is not. Your good law is someone else's bad one. There are no clear lines that distinguish between the two--it is all about perception. You can either come to terms with complexity or live in constant frustration and anxiety.

8/22/2008 09:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So what is your perception of the smoking ordinance passed last night?

8/22/2008 12:01:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home