Monday, April 02, 2007

Helpful managing strategies

In many industries including healthcare, managers are given tremendous responsibilities but all too often little direct authority. This type of atmosphere is extremely frustrating and discouraging for most managers.

Since managers often can’t make demands of the boss or even staff, they need to foster a workplace atmosphere of respect in which problems are solved as a team and the open exchange of ideas or debates is encouraged.

Here are some helpful hints from various authorities in the consulting field.

1. Don’t be a yes man (or woman). To earn respect, administrators must bring their own perspective and expertise to the table — even when their opinions run contrary to the direction the organization may wish to take.

2. Keep your boss out of trouble. Sometimes a manager’s most important task is to help the boss help themselves. If the top brass are all wet on a proposal, try to get them to slow down on the implementation. This is not the same as sabotaging a project.

3. Leave your door open. Stay abreast of both morale and sentiment among your staff. Good managers are always checking the pulse of the office.

4. Don’t interfere. Its one thing to be a team player, but stepping in to do another staff member’s job too often sends a message (inadvertent though it may be) that you don’t trust your staff to get it right. Pinch-hitting also confuses customers, patients, and employees, inviting repeat requests for similar “quick favors” down the road. One consultant said “Do it once, and it’s a favor, do it twice, and the job is yours.”

5. Be responsive. When the boss calls you with questions or concerns, respond to them quickly. Even if you don’t know the answer, it’s important to call the boss back and tell them you’re working on it. It’s always appreciated — and often, it relieves any pressure they may have felt.”

6. Invite input. In larger organizations, be sure to involve both everyone the strategic planning process.
Bosses often consider implementing new equipment or procedural changes that could affect other departments without input from some of the end users. If a company is going to grow, it needs everyone to be part of that growth. In any size company, everyone’s opinion matters; each staff member has unique insights into how the company might work better.

7. Don’t rush hiring decisions. When hiring for any position, it’s important to pay attention to any gut-level warning signs you may perceive, despite the pressure you may feel to quickly fill the vacancy. Don’t settle for mediocrity.”

8. Always question strategy. Before undertaking any new project, managers should always ask themselves, “Is the juice worth the squeeze?”

Labels: ,

18 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's ironic is that I've always considered most consultants as "yes" men.

4/02/2007 08:17:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ummm is this post about management, or consultants? Or consulting management...or management consultants? Or squeezing things...you lost me, doc.

4/02/2007 01:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What happens when you have two in management get physical with each other?A director at Floyd got physical with a manager(police report made)You know how Floyd handled it?They gave the director a week off and he used vacation time for this.Now how productive is this dept.now? Maybe a consultant could just tell the manager to keep making his boss look good.This is how people get hurt in work places!If your going to get involved Dan with Floyd's work practices you should start checking to see why this was acceptable.If you are a director is this a special treatment?Treat the manager like a worthless human being and get a week off with pay.

4/02/2007 07:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Which department was this in? We need to expose this like everything else on this blog.

4/02/2007 07:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The dept.that the director was physical with the manager was in the Information Systems Dept. This is common knowledge in the hospital.

4/02/2007 09:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When does the print version of the NA Health tabloid debut? The only things missing are stories of UFO's flying over the hospital. As is typical with the tone set on this blog by its "Christian" host, an otherwise normal and beautiful day ended with the latest gossip and trash.

4/02/2007 11:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Physical confrontation is never acceptable in the workplace, ask Bobby Knight. The "manager keep making his boss look good", that's going a bit far. Numerous employees have been to several administrators about this particular manager, including the x-CFO, with little results. The real question is why was this situation allowed to get this far by leadership? Start asking those questions.

4/03/2007 07:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Attrective, disease-free YWPF, occasional smoker, no children, decent rack, wishes to retire extremely early, ISO Male with substantial and steady income. All other attributes negotiable. Will not sign pre-nup. Will consider getting physical with directors, managers, and/or consultants.

4/03/2007 05:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Correction--Attractive. Or maybe attrective, depending on the accent.

4/03/2007 05:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TO annonyous 7:07:a.m.Yes,I'm sure other associates went to adminstration in the past.But I can assure you just as many went with other issues over the director.The current VP coulden't do anything with the director.Why?Because their is another VP that was coaching him how to get around these associates.When a VP tellS A DEPT. THEY DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY ISSUES(CURRENT VP)WHAT RECOURSE DO WE HAVE?The VP stated in an open meeting that the chain of command has to be obeyed,The message is ,let the director say and do what he wants.As long as the VP doesn't have to hear about it.The message was plan and simple from the VP,he didn't want to hear it.You said ask the question why leadership let it get this far?Well you've just been told.If a director,manager gets physical with me,Floyd doesn't have enough lawyers to cover what it will cost.There has been many documentations that adminstration,management council,can treat associates badly as well as each other.Please don't justify what a director who takes trips with a VP shares with you.I hope Mr.Miles still is reading this.Maybe Mr.miles will talk to the board about all the issues involving ADMIN,Director's and managers.YOU can not push and cuss a fellow associate in any way shape or form think you can get away with it.Let the CEO pull this and you would be at the bottom of it.

4/03/2007 10:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The IS manager is one nice and remarkable African American guy. He is our best manager and has many successes to his credit. He gets along with the vast majority of people and he is a positive inspiring person to speak with. He has a true understanding and vision for Information Technology and is in a class of his own. We enjoy working for him because he is fair, challenges us, recognize our efforts, values our opinions, supports us, organizes our work and creates a true team atmosphere. He is this way with everyone in IS. He is one heck of an engineer holding several major certifications. What did we accomplish with our manager’s help? Well we recently implemented a new cisco phone system, standardized our workstations and servers, completed every assignment given to us, kept hackers at bay, successfully implemented the new wing, implemented a new wireless network, successfully migrated everyone to the new wing, prevent vendors from taking off with all the cash, replaced a token ring network that use to crash all the time with a cisco network that is reliable. When our manager recommended a couple of outdated network switches be replaced that could impact ER, Cardiology, Radiology, Pharmacy, Lab and others… the IS Director and VP blocked the order (which was previously approved by the CEO in December). This order made it as far as purchasing. My manager knew the network would eventually crash without the requested network switches, but the IS Director said he would not get a dime. When our manager produced statistical data showing a crash was imminent, the IS Director got mad and became violent. Now that’s the truth. Later our Network Analyst was fired out of retaliation for saying he witnessed the pushing incident. This created fear throughout IS. The couple of associates who went to administration (a couple of years ago) were the Director’s pets put up to doing his dirty work. It did not stand because there was no justification. The CFO spoke with the entire department to get to the truth. Perhaps the Board should question the former CFO about the Directors racist practices. If my manager unloaded with all the dirt this Director has been up to the lawyers would be busy for years. But like I said, he is a nice guy. Boss keep your head up.

4/05/2007 08:59:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The new VP expects people to follow the chain of command. Hats off to him. The x-CFO had been hand holding the Network Mgr and undermining the IS Director for years.

4/05/2007 09:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The IS manager is a caucasian female.
Get your facts straight!

Having said that, why is race an issue, or even mentioned? Disgusting.

4/05/2007 09:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The present IS manager blogged about having the altercation with his director exceeds any previous managers. Sue Terrell is an asset and not sure of her title and only know she is in management. Jack Mccloskey is nice enough however it is a known factor he has been given a long rope in the past as well as an unlimited budget ONLY because no one above him knew anything about computers. If only someone reputable could be appointed in the capacity of VP.

4/07/2007 01:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the record,we have two IS director's.One is Charles and the other is Sue T.I can only speak of my dealings with Charles.He has respect from all hospital staff.When the dept I work in has a problem,not only will Charles get it resolved he will tell you when it will take place.His staff is always more then willing to assist. They want internal customers satisfied.The director now appears in areas where some staff didn't even know his name.Charles is not behind the scenes kind of man.He wants the organization to be successful and will assist you in any way he can.The big problem in IS is this manager is so much more intlligent then the director.Instead of reaping Charles expertise he continues to undermine him,Charles is a great guy and his biggest problem with Jack is that everyone in the building knows that charles is the expert and Jack is setting waiting to retire.Hang in there charles.The good lord knows about your potiental and he'll get you thru this.I know how much faith you have and it will all work out.We have evil people in the building that GOD will help them help them selves out the door.Please don't you dare give up. Gooey and me know you will survive,Sincerly,your friend and co-worker.

4/07/2007 02:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OPPS.I meant we have two IS managers.

4/07/2007 02:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you spoken to all 1300 hospital employees to see if they garner respect for him? You might get 1300 different answers. Not all of them will reply with an answer of respect. Especially coworkers in his own department.

4/07/2007 06:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Both managers are great and able to take us into the future. The current VP has more honor than you think. The x-CFO wasn't bad either.

Lets tone down the rhetoric and trust administration. Your comments are not as anonymous as you may think. I mean it's the Internet.

4/07/2007 11:49:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home